Meeting outcomes - Overview of tasks

draft by Derek Reeve, June 29, 1998

Participants at the meeting were of the opinion that the technology to allow the delivery of interoperable educational objects via the Web will become available very soon. Furthermore the support for online learning programmes from governments and significant higher education bodies is such that it is inevitable that such programmes will expand dramatically in the short-term. The view of the meeting, therefore, was that we should work to ensure that GIScience educators are as well placed as possible to take advantage of the opportunities, and avoid the pitfalls, which the shift towards online teaching will generate.

From a range of possibilities, the participants decided that three major tasks should be given initial priority :-

Task 1 : Metadata for GIScience Education Materials

A major concern must be to ensure that the interests of GIScience are strongly represented in the super-disciplinary projects which are presently laying down the ground-rules for online, educational interoperability. Just as the OGC are presently acting as a lobbying and technical development group to ensure that 'geography' is properly accommodated within emerging Distributed Computer Environments, so too GIScience educators need to lobby to ensure that GIScience' is properly represented in emerging online educational initiatives. It was decided, therefore that an immediate task for the group will be to work with educational metadatabase projects such as IMS, the WWW consortium, the Alexandria project and similar initiatives within the library community to explore how readily GIScience-relevant metadata can be embedded within their structures.

Task 2 : Prototype Knowledge Base for GIScience Education Materials

The participants believed that it would be desirable to generate as quickly as possible a prototype GIScience knowledge base, in order to learn what workloads are involved in creating such a structure and to create an exemplar which can be used at conferences and workshops to generate wider awareness. The meeting was impressed by the potential of the work already done by the ESRI knowledge base project. Rather than create an entirely new structure, it seemed appropriate to take advantage of the existing ESRI software. The second major task for the group, will be to generate an exemplar GIScience online knowledge base using the ESRI model.

Task 3 : Incentives for interoperable GIS education.

There was a consensus within the meeting that the move towards online GIScience education should not be viewed purely, or even primarily, as a technical issue. For online GIScience education to be successful, academics will need to feel that it is worthwhile to spend their time writing educational objects. Higher Education institutions will need to be able to see how revenue might be generated from online teaching. Students will need to feel that online teaching represents an advance in their learning programmes. There was a feeling within the group that the incentives which might make online GIScience teaching take-off need to be explored. The third task the group set itself, therefore, is to research the motivations which lie behind current online teaching initiatives and to try to anticipate what incentives might be necessary in future to encourage  GIScience interoperable education to develop strongly. The intention is that these three tasks will each be completed within an eighteen month period after which the technical and institutional requirements which need to be fulfilled to make interoperable GIScience education successful will be much better understood.

The meeting agreed that within each of these tasks an emphasis should be placed upon disseminating as widely as possible the outcomes of our activities.


Go to the next section of the report - Metadata task

Go back to the Table of Contents