NCGIA Core Curriculum in Geographic Information Science
URL: "http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/giscc/units/u006/u006.html"
Unit 006 - Human Cognition of the Spatial World
by Daniel R.
Montello, Department of Geography
University of California Santa Barbara, montello@geog.ucsb.edu
This section was edited by Reginald Golledge, Department of Geography, University of California Santa Barbara.
This unit is part of the NCGIA
Core Curriculum in Geographic Information Science. These materials
may be used for study, research, and education, but please credit the author,
Daniel R. Montello and the project, NCGIA Core Curriculum in GIScience.
All commercial rights reserved. Copyright 1997 by Daniel R. Montello.
Your comments on these materials are welcome. A link to an evaluation
form is provided at the end of this document.
Advanced Organizer
Unit Topics and learning outcomes
-
This section sets the scene by differentiating between objects and processes
and by using fundamental understanding of the spatial world to provide
a necessary knowledge base for GIS.
Unit 006 - Human Cognition of the Spatial World
1. Introduction
-
at human scales, the world consists of objects, events, processes, and
a background environment
-
the study of cognition is about knowledge: its acquisition, storage and
retrieval, manipulation, and use by humans and other intelligent creatures
-
cognition includes sensation and perception, thinking, imagery, reasoning
and problem-solving, memory, learning, and language
-
cognitive structures and process are part of the mind, which emerges from
a brain and nervous system inside of a body that exists in a social and
physical world
-
spatial cognition deals with the cognition of spatial properties of the
world, including location, size, distance, direction, shape, pattern, movement,
and inter-object relations.
-
this unit is about spatial cognition and its relevance for Geographic Information
Systems
2. Sensing and Perceiving the World
-
sensation is the first response of the nervous system to stimulation from
patterned energy in the world
-
sensory systems are organized into modalities, including vision,
hearing, smelling, tasting, pressure and texture, temperature, kinesthesis
(limb position and movement), and vestibular senses (gravity and body acceleration)
-
perception is the active acquisition of knowledge about the self and the
world through the senses
-
characteristics of the perceived world:
-
locational perspective -- world perceived from a point-of-view, incomplete
access to world
-
redundancy of information (e.g., depth cues of interposition and linear
perspective)
-
constancy (color, size, position, shape) -- objects, events, and background
maintain many characteristics even as viewing conditions change
-
meaningfulness -- tendency to perceive meaningful, familiar objects and
events
3. Cognitive Maps
-
are internal representations of the world and its spatial properties stored
in memory (also called "mental maps")
-
what's out there, what are its attributes, where it is, how to get there
-
are both idiosyncratic to individuals, and shared among groups
-
not like a cartographic map in the head
-
not a unitary representation with a constant scale, not completely integrated
-
consists of discrete pieces (more vector than raster)
-
landmarks, routes and regions
-
pieces determined by physical, perceptual, or conceptual boundaries
-
hierarchically organized pieces
-
multiple levels of pieces differing in status (e.g., size)
-
relation of containment between levels
-
pieces within a level not completely connected
-
hierarchies revealed by patterns of errors or times to respond to questions
about
-
the relative locations of places within and between pieces
-
spatial information not well modeled by metric geometries (such as high
school Euclidean geometry)
-
emotional associations too (connotative meaning)
-
distortions in cognitive maps
-
distortions tell us about properties of cognitive maps
-
how is accuracy of knowledge defined?
-
correspondence to physical measurement
-
group consensus
-
behavioral adaptiveness (does it work?)
-
examples
-
continents are aligned, e.g., South America is thought to be due south
of North America when it is actually southeast
-
road intersections and barriers increase apparent distances between places
-
turns are remembered more like right angles and curved lines are often
straightened
4. Spatial Learning and Development
-
learning is a relatively permanent change in cognition or behavior
that results from practice or experience
-
spatial knowledge is learned via one or more media of acquisition
-
direct sensorimotor experience, maps, models, photos and drawings, movies
and videos, verbal and written language, virtual spaces
-
media has consequences for nature of acquired knowledge
-
cognitive development is systematic change in the content and process of
cognition over time, including learning, maturation, and growth (child
or adult)
-
child psychologist Piaget known for a qualitative "stage theory" of cognitive
development of children
-
change from concrete sensorimotor space in infancy to abstract spatial
reasoning in adolescence
-
"frame of reference" used to define locations changes from egocentric (self-centered)
to allocentric (externally referenced)
-
geometry of spatial knowledge changes from topological to projective and
metric
-
information-processing approach provides an alternative theory of continuous
and quantitative development
-
traditional theory of developmental sequence in spatial knowledge of the
world inspired by Piagetian theory; consists of 3 stages or elements, acquired
over time
-
first is "landmark knowledge": unique patterns of perceptual events that
identify a place
-
second is "route knowledge": sensorimotor routines that connect ordered
sequences of landmarks; little or no metric spatial knowledge
-
third is "survey knowledge": two-dimensional layout knowledge of simultaneous
interrelations of locations; allows detouring, shortcutting, and creative
navigation
-
information-processing approach inspires an alternative sequence of continuous
and quantitative increase in extent, accuracy, and completeness of sometimes
crude metric spatial knowledge
5. Navigation
-
navigation is coordinated and goal-directed route following through space
-
"metaphorical navigation" through a math problem, text, computer menu system,
computer network
consists of 2 components: locomotion and wayfinding
locomotion is guidance through space in response to local sensorimotor
information in immediate surrounds
find support surfaces, avoid obstacles and barriers, follow beacons, move
through openings
modes: crawling, walking, bikes, cars, planes, etc.
wayfinding is planning and decision-making in response to nonlocal information,
undertaken to reach goal
route-choice, destination scheduling, orientation to nonperceptible features,
giving directions
-
two fundamental processes of orientation during navigation
-
landmark-based or pilotage ("taking-a-fix") is orientation by recognition
of external features
-
dead reckoning is orientation relative to a start location by integrating
information about velocity or acceleration during movement, without reference
to recognized features
-
navigation is carried out via skills that vary in their demands on attentional
capacity
-
relatively automatic skills do not demand much attention, such as locomotion
in "normal" environments, following familiar routes to work, etc.
-
controlled or effortful skills demand focussed attention, such as wayfinding
in unfamiliar environments, giving directions, etc.
6. Using and Learning Maps
-
major purpose of cartographic maps is to communicate geographical information
and support geographical problem-solving
-
how do maps effectively communicate?
-
humans fantastic at quickly extracting great amounts of information from
spatial depictions (images) like pictures or graphs
-
even nonspatial or nonperceivable information can be displayed this way
(visualization or spatialization)
-
maps use convenient scales and viewing perspectives (you can perceive all
from a single viewpoint)
-
maps highlight and clarify relevant properties; omit or downplay irrelevant
properties
-
how can maps confuse or distort communication?
-
projections, generalizations, exaggerations, omissions may mislead or distort
knowledge
-
scale translations between maps or between map and world are difficult
-
perspective translation from overhead to terrain-level view may be confusing
-
interpretation of symbols (colors, point symbols, contour lines) may be
difficult or misleading
-
training and experience with maps changes the way they are perceived and
interpreted
-
maps show robust "alignment effects", especially when used for navigation
-
confusing if not oriented with the top of map as the direction you are
facing when viewing it (such as "you-are-here" maps)
-
such misalignment causes errors and delays
7. Spatial Language
-
spatial information often expressed verbally
-
giving verbal directions, spatial descriptions in stories, road signs,
computer queries
producing spatial language often requires translation of nonverbal spatial
knowledge, which can alter the knowledge
some properties of spatial language
nearly all grammatical classes can express spatial information, but especially
prepositions
prepositions often ambiguous, difficult to translate into other languages
"the house on the lake" vs. "the boat on the lake"; "water in a cup" vs.
"crack in a cup"
language expresses mostly nonquantitative or imprecise quantitative ("fuzzy")
information about space; connections and general location more important
for example, we say "turn left at the gas station", not "turn 80° after
you go .6 miles"
quantitative precision usually unnecessary or even confusing for verbal
communication (not always)
context is critical in interpreting spatial language
context provided by who is speaking, situation, preceding events, etc.
spatial quantity terms: near, far, small, large
spatial location terms: here, there, left, right
language often uses spatial metaphors for nonspatial concepts
examples: "roundabout argument", "lost in life", "success is dead ahead",
"encroach on my space"
-
verbal directions
-
person giving directions makes assumptions about questioner's ability to
understand the directions
-
what makes the best directions?
-
landmarks and actions only, or an overall description of the space?
-
how do gestures and maps help? how are they combined with words?
-
how much quantitative precision is best?
-
should corrective or overshoot statements be given?
-
many ambiguities in verbal directions
-
what's a block? what's an intersection? what's a right turn when 5 streets
come together?
-
"you can't miss it": what does that mean, why do we say it, how do we decide
when to say it?
8. Relevance to GIS
-
GISs are frequently difficult to use effectively and efficiently and have
not nearly reached their potential
-
costs more time and money than it needs to, is more difficult and unpleasant
to use than it has to be, and does not perform all of the tasks that it
might
-
limitations and problems could be improved with greater attention to cognitive
issues in GIS
-
how do humans acquire, reason about, and communicate knowledge with GIS
-
cognitive issues touch on all three major functions of GIS: the storage,
representation, and analysis of earth-referenced data
-
some examples of cognitive issues in GIS
-
how experts and laypeople conceptualize and reason about geographical space,
and how GIS can be designed and taught to support both classes of users
-
how people express spatial information in natural language (such as English),
and how this can be used to understand communication with a GIS in natural
language (such as a navigation computer inside a car)
-
how interfaces should be designed to promote accurate and efficient communication
of spatial and geographic information, such as scale, uncertainty, and
network structure
9. Exam and Discussion Questions
-
Discuss ways that the cognitive map is like and unlike a cartographic map.
Give some examples of phenomena that support your position.
-
The traditional theory of how spatial knowledge develops over time in a
new environment is inspired by the child psychology of Piaget. Describe
this traditional theory. What sorts of evidence would support various parts
of the traditional theory? What sorts of evidence would argue against parts
of the traditional theory?
-
There is a great deal of interest in creating GISs that can directly communicate
with users in their own language. Discuss at least two applications where
this goal makes sense. Considering the properties of language, especially
spatial language, what are some of the problems that must be solved to
make language-competent GISs a reality?
-
An argument has been made above that GIS can be improved by understanding
human perception and cognition. Review and discuss this argument. In what
ways do you agree or disagree with the argument?
10. References
Reviews of perception and cognition may be found in any psychology
textbook in those areas.
-
Golledge, R.G., 1987. "Environmental cognition", in D. Stokols and I. Altman,
editors, Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York,
131-174. Reviews 25 years of research in geography, psychology, and related
disciplines.
-
Mark, D.M., and A.U. Frank, editors, 1991. Cognitive and linguistic
aspects of geographic space. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
The Netherlands. Contains many chapters examining cognitive and linguistic
issues in GIS from a variety of disciplines.
-
Montello, D.R., and S.M. Freundschuh, 1995. "Sources of spatial knowledge
and their implications for GIS: An introduction", Geographical Systems
2:169-176. Concise overview of several perceptual and cognitive issues
relevant to GIS.
-
Tversky, B., 1992. "Distortions in cognitive maps", Geoforum 23:131-138.
Readable and concise review of research on the structure of cognitive maps,
patterns of distortions, etc.
We are very interested in your comments and suggestions for improving this
material. Please follow the link above to the evaluation form if
you would like to contribute in this manner to this evolving project.
Citation
To reference this material use the appropriate variation of the following
information:
by Dan Montello, NCGIA Core Curriculum in GIS, National Center
for Geographic Information and Analysis, University of California, Santa
Barbara, Unit 006, http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/giscc/units/u006/u006.html,
posted November 5, 1997.
The correct URL for this page is: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/giscc/units/u006/u006.html.
Last revised: November 5, 1997.
Gateway
to the Core Curriculum