GISHE '96 Conference summary

During the final session of the conference, approximately 40 conference participants, working in small groups, drafteed action statements addressing a number of the items identified in Saturday's breakout group discussions. Following is a summary of those statements, listed in no specific order and with many obvious areas of overlap. Action items listed following suggest themes for further discussion at future conferences or as activities to be addressed by associated organizations.


Networking

Issues

Mechanisms are needed for the sharing of information regarding GIS education, particularly academic programs, course curricula, distance learning, hardware and software, data and instructional materials. The current GIS periodicals do not adequately address the issues confronting GIS education, or convey information needed by GIS educators

Action items

Jay Morgan, Dick Scott, Weihong Fan, Craig Caupp

Building private and agency partnerships

Issues

In order to target student skills and knowledge to more effectively meet societal needs, it is imperative that partnerships with private and government agencies be established. These relationships have a great potential to build practical application into student projects. In addition, these partnerships can rejuvenate the curricula of academic institutions.

Action items

  1. establish interdisciplinary advisory boards to guide program development
  2. establish internship/apprenticeship opportunities
  3. plan curriculum to include knowledge, skills and professional relationships
  4. identify grant opportunities to infuse change
  5. involve agency professionals in the instructional mission
Roberto Garza, Andrew Nazzaro, Freda Brown, Zong-Guo Xia

Capacity building

Issues

For successful application of GIS within an organizational context, there is a need for capacity building. Capacity building is defined as the development of the human resource. This does not preclude the need for other resources, e.g. money, equipment, data and infrastructure, but the focus for educators is upon the people. Capacity building can take place at several levels in a hierarchy -- local, regional or national.

Many organizations are already embarked upon this activity, however their plans are often carried out as isolated activities without regard for lessons already learned. There are benefits to be gained from a better understanding of the process and recognition of critical factors.

Action items

  1. Articulate a generic, multi-level model for capacity building to guide organizations and individuals.
  2. Collect and analyze case studies at various levels and in different parts of the world.
  3. Organize conference sessions to present models and case studies and to move towards better understanding of the issues.
Robert Maher, Richard Wright, Karen Kemp

Identifying GIS employment needs

Issues

There is a major problem defining the scope of GIS employment opportunities within this rapidly expanding field. Information about current and predicted GIS employment needs is required. The following types of information should be compiled:
  1. The scope of employment in current and potential new fields and industries that use GIS, including:
  2. Skill levels required by employers:
  3. Wage ranges
  4. Advancement possibilities
  5. Need for additional education for existing employees
  6. Appropriate survey methods for collecting this information

Actions

  1. Define GIS markets and related job markets (existing and potential)
  2. Conduct a survey of completed surveys on GIS employment, collect data from Department of Labor and Commerce and state equivalents, compile that information and make it generally available.
  3. Prepare a survey to identify employment needs
John Schaeffer, Ann Stefani, John Albasini, Fred Toppen

GIS laboratory facilities

Issues

When establishing new GIS laboratory facilities, several issues should be addressed, including

Action items

To address these issues, a number of action items can be enumerated: Susan Macey and others

GIS training for educators

GIS training for educators will occur in two principal contexts: Inservice education emphasizes discipline-based applications. It is designed to assist faculty in making curriculum connections between GIS and spatial concepts taught in a variety of subject areas.

In preservice education, GIS should be a broad-based enabling technology that students apply whenever spatial topics are being explored. In this manner, GIS will eventually become another tool in their teaching repertoires.

Preservice action items

Inservice action items

Richard Audet, Bob Sharpe

Professional Development

Issues

Current formal education and training provision for employment in the Geographic Information industry does not cater to the needs of a range of entrants into the profession or existing IT professionals newly acquiring GIS capability. There is an associated need for continuing Professional Development (CPD) and skills updating driven by technology change. As well, there is a need to provide for individual accreditation to work in the field, for external validation of education and training opportunities, and for tools to allow individual career assessment.

Presently, provision for the necessary continuing Professional Development is ad hoc and arbitrary, being provided by a mix of system vendor courses, some community colleges and the universities. Often such programs are characterized by model partnerships among these providers and the user community, but they lack the involvement of professional associations and there is no self-evident infrastructure which might provide this.

To rectify this situation, it is recommended that the GI community:

Charles Monsma, David Unwin

Distance Education and the use of the WWW

Distance education (perhaps better termed "Mediated" or "Distributed" education?) is likely to emerge as an important component of GIS education at all levels, but particularly for professional and continuing education. The World Wide Web is an obvious technology to support such distributed education.

Action items

Realization of the potential of distance education will entail:
  1. sharing didactic, practical information about what works and what doesn't
  2. exploring appropriate ways to support students, promote student-faculty interaction and reward faculty for their efforts in distance education
  3. create or expand consortia for distance GIS education to reduce risk, spread costs and share expertise
  4. support research on computing delivery technologies
To use the Web effectively for distance education, access, distribution, sharing and collaboration will involve:
  1. creation of a clearinghouse -- needs to be well planned, organized and indexed
  2. consideration and improvement in the quality of access to the net
Ken Foote, Petra Cremers, Joseph Strobl, Joseph Betit, Karlis Kalviskis, John Wilson

Key spatial concepts

(This topic includes a recognition of the issue of geographic information science versus the use of GIS in teaching spatial concepts.) We teach spatial concepts to learn spatial thinking. We need to use multiple representations -- numbers, text, graphics -- in learning spatial concepts. GIS is one tool to stimulate cognitive spatial thinking.

Action items

Joe Loon, Carlson, Jamie Cromartie, Micha Pazner

Learning models for GIS

There is a need for research concerning the effectiveness of different learning models (combined with computer-student interaction methods and issues). This research must take into account the cognitive level of students (their "geographical eye", their spatial concepts).

Action items


Vertical Articulation

At the conference, K-12 educators expressed a desire for fostering ways to work with universities in obtaining guidance, some training, information about data, etc. Community college educators expressed an interest in guidance about curricula for 2 year colleges and to ensure articulation with the content of university courses. Therefore, there is a need to identify a core curriculum of what fits best at different levels, articulation for course credit transfer, to help high school programs know what to aim for, and to know what spatial concepts are important.

The function of articulating programs is to provide pathways for students to travel through the education system in an efficient method in order that they can attain their individual goals. By using established and standardized curricular objectives, competencies and commonalties can be identified. Leveling of courses can be based on these competencies and commonalties. Thus we may be able to answer the question "what should be learned in a course called "Introduction to GIS" "?

Action items

  1. identify needs of the marketplace and education communities
  2. define undergraduate competencies in GIS
  3. identify the commonalties in order to articulate necessary competencies
Derek Thompson, Carol Bowen, Jack Paris, Michael Stumpe, Paul van Helden